NV Raychem SA
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for NV Raychem SA.The latest application filed is for "method for applying covering material to an elongate substrate".
- NV Raychem SA - Kessel-Lo BE
- NV Raychem SA - BE BE
- NV Raychem S.A. - Kessel-lo BE
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Method for applying covering material to an elongate substrate Grant 5,589,019 - Van Beersel , et al. December 31, 1 | 1996-12-31 |
| Article and method for applying a temperature indicating composition Grant 5,573,848 - Van Praet November 12, 1 | 1996-11-12 |
| Electrofit fibre optics butt splice Grant 5,249,253 - Franckx , et al. September 28, 1 | 1993-09-28 |
| Heat-recoverable article Grant 5,236,765 - Cordia , et al. * August 17, 1 | 1993-08-17 |
| Electrofit fibre optics butt splice Grant 4,913,522 - Nolf , et al. April 3, 1 | 1990-04-03 |
| Heat-recoverable article Grant 4,866,252 - Van Loo , et al. September 12, 1 | 1989-09-12 |
| Moisture detection Grant 4,862,701 - Small , et al. September 5, 1 | 1989-09-05 |
| Coated recoverable articles Grant 4,732,412 - van der Linden , et al. March 22, 1 | 1988-03-22 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 