Norton; William W.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Norton; William W..The latest application filed is for "high efficiency water treatment system".
- Norton; William W. - Lincolnshire IL
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| High efficiency water treatment system Grant 5,160,608 - Norton November 3, 1 | 1992-11-03 |
| Faucet-mounted microbial filter Grant 4,980,056 - Norton December 25, 1 | 1990-12-25 |
| Purified water storage system with accumulator tank and diaphragm responsive valves Grant 4,678,565 - Norton July 7, 1 | 1987-07-07 |
| Faucet mounted purifier Grant 4,676,896 - Norton June 30, 1 | 1987-06-30 |
| System for treating fluids Grant 4,668,402 - Norton May 26, 1 | 1987-05-26 |
| Tank lining system Grant 4,537,329 - Norton August 27, 1 | 1985-08-27 |
| Liquid delivery system Grant 4,411,047 - Norton October 25, 1 | 1983-10-25 |
| Fluid pump Grant 4,380,236 - Norton April 19, 1 | 1983-04-19 |
| Potted-typed seal with stress relief and method of making same Grant 4,334,993 - Norton June 15, 1 | 1982-06-15 |
| Electronic injection metering and monitoring system Grant 4,275,480 - Norton , et al. June 30, 1 | 1981-06-30 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 