Trademark applications and grants for Norman Daniel P. Norman Daniel P has 2 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "TOP TEN SELLING"
Patent Application | Date |
---|---|
Memory Device For A Cellular Telephone 20090075699 - 12/326433 Griffith; Gregory Clyde ;   et al. | 2009-03-19 |
Memory device for a cellular telephone 20050090286 - 10/977920 Griffith, Gregory Clyde ;   et al. | 2005-04-28 |
Memory device for a cellular telephone 7,796,974 - 12/326,433 Griffith , et al. September 14, 2 | 2010-09-14 |
Memory device for a cellular telephone 7,460,854 - 10/977,920 Griffith , et al. December 2, 2 | 2008-12-02 |
Memory device for a cellular telephone 6,819,916 - 09/083,452 Griffith , et al. November 16, 2 | 2004-11-16 |
Portable radiotelephone with sliding cover and automatic antenna extension 6,073,027 - 08/705,426 Norman , et al. June 6, 2 | 2000-06-06 |
Auxiliary fold-out room 6,070,372 - 09/082,041 Norman , et al. June 6, 2 | 2000-06-06 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
---|---|
![]() "TOP TEN SELLING" 3522824 77217078 |
TOP TEN SELLING 2007-06-27 |
![]() "AWFUL WAFFLES" 2739149 78114446 |
AWFUL WAFFLES 2002-03-13 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.