Trademark applications and grants for Norlase Aps. Norlase Aps has 6 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "LYNX"
State Incorporated | DENMARK |
Entity Type | anpartsselskab (aps) |
Address | Brydehusvej 13 Ballerup DENMARK 2750 |
Patent Application | Date |
---|---|
Body mounted Laser Indirect Ophthalmoscope (LIO) system 20220211264 - 17/704069 Fava; Greg | 2022-07-07 |
Voice control system for ophthalmic laser systems 20210366482 - 17/394616 Fava; Greg ;   et al. | 2021-11-25 |
Scanning laser ophthalmic treatment system and method of operation 20210100688 - 16/994722 Buss; Thomas ;   et al. | 2021-04-08 |
MEDICAL LASER SYSTEM 20200405540 - 16/088238 Flanders; Dale ;   et al. | 2020-12-31 |
Apparatus for Photothermal Ophthalmic Treatment 20190365569 - 16/484575 Skovgaard; Peter ;   et al. | 2019-12-05 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
---|---|
![]() "LYNX" 98151968 |
LYNX 2023-08-26 |
![]() "ECHO" 97200831 |
ECHO 2022-01-03 |
![]() "LION" 6324292 90000667 |
LION 2020-06-14 |
![]() "NORLASE" 87826471 |
NORLASE 2018-03-08 |
![]() "NORLASE" 87826531 |
NORLASE 2018-03-08 |
![]() "LEAF" 5904061 87826574 |
LEAF 2018-03-08 |
NCAGE Code | R9211 | NORLASE APS |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.