Noda; Shigeru
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Noda; Shigeru.The latest application filed is for "method for preventing influenza virus infection by administering a dry powder pharmaceutical composition".
- Noda; Shigeru - Tokyo N/A JP
- Noda; Shigeru - Kawasaki JP
- Noda; Shigeru - Osaka JP
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Dry powder pharmaceutical composition for inhalation Grant 9,339,487 - Miyajima , et al. May 17, 2 | 2016-05-17 |
| Method For Preventing Influenza Virus Infection By Administering A Dry Powder Pharmaceutical Composition App 20160128972 - MIYAJIMA; Makoto ; et al. | 2016-05-12 |
| Dry Powder Pharmaceutical Composition For Inhalation App 20110256188 - Miyajima; Makoto ; et al. | 2011-10-20 |
| Liquid crystal display and heater control circuit for use with said display Grant 5,744,819 - Yamamoto , et al. April 28, 1 | 1998-04-28 |
| Optical beam scanner for bar-code Grant 5,039,184 - Murakawa , et al. August 13, 1 | 1991-08-13 |
| Optical connector Grant 4,779,952 - Hayashi , et al. October 25, 1 | 1988-10-25 |
| Arrangement for preventing misconnection between optical connectors Grant 4,529,263 - Moriyama , et al. July 16, 1 | 1985-07-16 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 