Niset; Martin L.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Niset; Martin L..The latest application filed is for "one-time programmable bitcell with native anti-fuse".
- Niset; Martin L. - Seattle WA
- Niset; Martin L. - Austin TX
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| One-time programmable bitcell with native anti-fuse Grant 10,032,784 - Horch , et al. July 24, 2 | 2018-07-24 |
| One-Time Programmable Bitcell with Native Anti-Fuse App 20180033795 - Horch; Andrew E. ; et al. | 2018-02-01 |
| Non-volatile memory with controlled program/erase Grant 7,397,703 - Niset , et al. July 8, 2 | 2008-07-08 |
| Nonvolatile memory cell programming Grant 7,342,833 - Cavins , et al. March 11, 2 | 2008-03-11 |
| Method and apparatus for programming/erasing a non-volatile memory Grant 7,292,473 - Niset , et al. November 6, 2 | 2007-11-06 |
| Non-volatile memory wih controlled program/erase App 20070223276 - Niset; Martin L. ; et al. | 2007-09-27 |
| Nonvolatile memory cell programming App 20070058434 - Cavins; Craig A. ; et al. | 2007-03-15 |
| Method and apparatus for programming/erasing a non-volatile memory App 20070053222 - Niset; Martin L. ; et al. | 2007-03-08 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 