Nidola; Antonio
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Nidola; Antonio.The latest application filed is for "anode for oxygen evolution in electrolytes containing fluorides or fluoride-complex anions".
- Nidola; Antonio - Milan IT
- Nidola; Antonio - Lugano CH
- Nidola; Antonio - BOTH OFLugano CH
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Anode for oxygen evolution in electrolytes containing fluorides or fluoride-complex anions Grant 6,019,878 - Nidola , et al. February 1, 2 | 2000-02-01 |
| Novel electrodes and methods of preparing and using same Grant 5,076,898 - Nidola , et al. December 31, 1 | 1991-12-31 |
| Method for preparing an electrode and use thereof in electrochemical processes Grant 4,724,052 - Nidola February 9, 1 | 1988-02-09 |
| Electrolysis cell Grant 4,468,311 - de Nora , et al. August 28, 1 | 1984-08-28 |
| Process for preparing electrochemical material Grant 4,395,436 - Bianchi , et al. July 26, 1 | 1983-07-26 |
| Electrolysis cell and method of generating halogen Grant 4,381,979 - De Nora , et al. May 3, 1 | 1983-05-03 |
| Deposition of catalytic electrodes on ion-exchange membranes Grant 4,364,803 - Nidola , et al. December 21, 1 | 1982-12-21 |
| Method for electrowinning metal Grant 4,288,302 - de Nora , et al. September 8, 1 | 1981-09-08 |
| Electrodes for electrolytic processes, especially metal electrowinning Grant 4,285,799 - de Nora , et al. August 25, 1 | 1981-08-25 |
| Electrodes for electrolytic processes, especially perchlorate production Grant 4,267,025 - de Nora , et al. May 12, 1 | 1981-05-12 |
| Novel electrodes and their use Grant 4,235,695 - De Nora , et al. November 25, 1 | 1980-11-25 |
| Novel electrocatalytic electrodes Grant 4,214,970 - Spaziante , et al. July 29, 1 | 1980-07-29 |
| Molten salt electrolysis Grant 4,187,155 - de Nora , et al. * February 5, 1 | 1980-02-05 |
| Sintered electrodes with electrocatalytic coating Grant 4,146,438 - de Nora , et al. March 27, 1 | 1979-03-27 |
| Electrocatalytic electrodes Grant 4,132,620 - Nidola , et al. January 2, 1 | 1979-01-02 |
| Silicon carbide-valve metal borides-carbon electrodes Grant 4,111,765 - De Nora , et al. September 5, 1 | 1978-09-05 |
| Manganese dioxide electrodes Grant 4,072,586 - De Nora , et al. February 7, 1 | 1978-02-07 |
| Method of producing a valve metal electrode with valve metal oxide semi-conductor face and methods of manufacture and use Grant 4,070,504 - Bianchi , et al. January 24, 1 | 1978-01-24 |
| Electrowinning method Grant 4,056,449 - de Nora , et al. November 1, 1 | 1977-11-01 |
| Valve metal electrode with valve metal oxide semi-conductive coating having a chlorine discharge in said coating Grant 4,003,817 - Bianchi , et al. January 18, 1 | 1977-01-18 |
| Valve metal electrode with valve metal oxide semi-conductive face Grant 3,948,751 - Bianchi , et al. April 6, 1 | 1976-04-06 |
| Method of electrowinning metals Grant 3,926,751 - De Nora , et al. December 16, 1 | 1975-12-16 |
| Anode for oxygen evolution Grant 3,878,083 - De Nora , et al. April 15, 1 | 1975-04-15 |
| Titanium Or Tantalum Base Electrodes With Applied Titanium Or Tantalum Oxide Face Activated With Noble Metals Or Noble Metal Oxides Grant 3,616,445 - Bianchi , et al. October 26, 1 | 1971-10-26 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 