loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Nibhanupudi; Shashidhar.The latest application filed is for "main field voltage limiter in brushless synchronous machines".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Main field voltage limiter in brushless synchronous machines Grant 10,084,409 - Desabhatla , et al. September 25, 2 | 2018-09-25 |
Main Field Voltage Limiter In Brushless Synchronous Machines App 20150349696 - Desabhatla; Sreedhar ;   et al. | 2015-12-03 |
Systems and methods for initializing a generator Grant 9,157,406 - Desabhatla , et al. October 13, 2 | 2015-10-13 |
Systems And Methods For Initializing A Generator App 20150219055 - Desabhatla; Sreedhar ;   et al. | 2015-08-06 |
Methods and systems for monitoring excitation of a generator based on a faulty status of a generator breaker Grant 8,964,337 - Sharma , et al. February 24, 2 | 2015-02-24 |
Methods and Systems for Monitoring Excitation of a Generator Based on a Faulty Status of a Generator Breaker App 20140185166 - Sharma; Abhinandan ;   et al. | 2014-07-03 |
Prediction system and method Grant 8,478,568 - Desabhatla , et al. July 2, 2 | 2013-07-02 |
Prediction System And Method App 20120105022 - Desabhatla; Sreedhar ;   et al. | 2012-05-03 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.