loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Ng; Natalie.The latest application filed is for "footwear upper".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Footwear upper Grant D707,435 - Ng June 24, 2 | 2014-06-24 |
Footwear upper Grant D706,024 - Ng June 3, 2 | 2014-06-03 |
Footwear upper Grant D705,529 - Ng May 27, 2 | 2014-05-27 |
Buckle Grant D682,736 - Ng May 21, 2 | 2013-05-21 |
Footwear upper Grant D661,080 - Ng June 5, 2 | 2012-06-05 |
Footwear upper Grant D660,571 - Ng May 29, 2 | 2012-05-29 |
Footwear outsole Grant D635,753 - Ng April 12, 2 | 2011-04-12 |
Footwear outsole Grant D634,526 - Ng March 22, 2 | 2011-03-22 |
Footwear upper Grant D633,703 - Ng March 8, 2 | 2011-03-08 |
Portion of a footwear upper Grant D631,241 - Ng January 25, 2 | 2011-01-25 |
Portion of a footwear upper Grant D630,833 - Ng January 18, 2 | 2011-01-18 |
Footwear upper Grant D630,832 - Ng January 18, 2 | 2011-01-18 |
Footwear upper Grant D629,596 - Ng December 28, 2 | 2010-12-28 |
Portion of a footwear upper Grant D629,597 - Ng December 28, 2 | 2010-12-28 |
Portion of a footwear upper Grant D616,184 - Ng May 25, 2 | 2010-05-25 |
Footwear upper Grant D610,789 - Ng March 2, 2 | 2010-03-02 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.