Neiman
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Neiman.The latest application filed is for "high security evolutive coding process and device for carrying out this process".
- Neiman - Courbevoie FR
- Neiman - Croissy FR
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| High security evolutive coding process and device for carrying out this process Grant 4,922,533 - Philippe May 1, 1 | 1990-05-01 |
| Lock of the disconnectable rotor type Grant 4,903,512 - Leroy , et al. February 27, 1 | 1990-02-27 |
| Device for preventing the theft of motor vehicles Grant 4,852,681 - Bombled August 1, 1 | 1989-08-01 |
| Infrared transmitter of coded message having fixed code and large number of combinations Grant 4,850,046 - Philippe July 18, 1 | 1989-07-18 |
| Reflector for automobile headlight with improved full beam Grant 4,794,504 - Creff December 27, 1 | 1988-12-27 |
| Steering lock for blocking the rotary movement of a motor vehicle steering shaft Grant 4,776,189 - Weber , et al. October 11, 1 | 1988-10-11 |
| Lock mounting Grant 4,756,638 - Neyret | 1988-07-12 |
| Anti-theft device with key presence security Grant 4,685,313 - Neyret August 11, 1 | 1987-08-11 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 