loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for NAYAK; Kartik Ravidas.The latest application filed is for "flexible byzantine fault tolerant protocol using message delay upper bound for client commit decision".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Flexible Byzantine Fault Tolerant Protocol Using Message Delay Upper Bound For Client Commit Decision App 20220237180 - MALKHI; Dahlia ;   et al. | 2022-07-28 |
Byzantine fault tolerance that supports heterogeneous clients Grant 11,341,122 - Malkhi , et al. May 24, 2 | 2022-05-24 |
Flexible byzantine fault tolerant protocol using message delay upper bound for client commit decision Grant 11,334,561 - Malkhi , et al. May 17, 2 | 2022-05-17 |
Synchronous State Machine Replication For Achieving Consensus App 20210279255 - NAYAK; Kartik Ravidas ;   et al. | 2021-09-09 |
Byzantine Fault Tolerance That Supports Heterogeneous Clients App 20210026843 - MALKHI; Dahlia ;   et al. | 2021-01-28 |
Flexible Byzantine Fault Tolerant Protocol Using Message Delay Upper Bound For Client Commit Decision App 20210026842 - MALKHI; Dahlia ;   et al. | 2021-01-28 |
Flexible Byzantine Fault Tolerance With Alive-but-corrupt Faults App 20210027288 - MALKHI; Dahlia ;   et al. | 2021-01-28 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.