loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for NAVIPHARM CO., LTD..The latest application filed is for "novel lactobacillus having various functions, and use thereof".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Lactic acid bacteria and use thereof Grant 11,324,786 - Kim , et al. May 10, 2 | 2022-05-10 |
Novel Lactobacillus Having Various Functions, and Use Thereof App 20220088093 - Kim; Dong Hyun ;   et al. | 2022-03-24 |
Lactobacillus having various functions, and use thereof Grant 11,202,811 - Kim , et al. December 21, 2 | 2021-12-21 |
Novel Lactic Acid Bacteria And Use Thereof App 20210260140 - Kim; Dong-Hyun ;   et al. | 2021-08-26 |
Rivastigmine-containing sustained-release pharmaceutical composition Grant 10,835,497 - Park , et al. November 17, 2 | 2020-11-17 |
Rivastigmine-containing Sustained-release Pharmaceutical Composition App 20180125785 - PARK; Sang Geun ;   et al. | 2018-05-10 |
Composition for preventing or treating osteoporosis, and manufacturing method therefor Grant 9,044,401 - Park , et al. June 2, 2 | 2015-06-02 |
Time-delayed Sustained Release Pharmaceutical Composition Comprising Dapoxetine For Oral Administration App 20130095180 - Lee; Chang-Kyoo ;   et al. | 2013-04-18 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.