loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Nattkemper; Dieter.The latest application filed is for "failover apparatus and method for an asynchronous data communication network".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
ATM communication system interconnect/termination unit Grant 6,535,512 - Daniel , et al. March 18, 2 | 2003-03-18 |
Failover apparatus and method for an asynchronous data communication network App 20020141332 - Barnard, Jeff ;   et al. | 2002-10-03 |
Single chip networking device with enhanced memory access co-processor Grant 6,373,846 - Daniel , et al. April 16, 2 | 2002-04-16 |
ATM communication system interconnect/termination unit Grant 5,982,749 - Daniel , et al. November 9, 1 | 1999-11-09 |
ATM communication system interconnect/termination unit Grant 5,920,561 - Daniel , et al. July 6, 1 | 1999-07-06 |
ATM communication system interconnect/termination unit Grant 5,848,068 - Daniel , et al. December 8, 1 | 1998-12-08 |
ATM communication system interconnect/termination unit Grant 5,841,772 - Daniel , et al. November 24, 1 | 1998-11-24 |
Method and apparatus for fast synchronization of T1 extended superframes Grant 5,621,773 - Varma , et al. April 15, 1 | 1997-04-15 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.