Nathan; Krishna Sundaram
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Nathan; Krishna Sundaram.The latest application filed is for "flexibly interfaceable portable computing device".
- Nathan; Krishna Sundaram - New York NY
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Flexibly interfaceable portable computing device Grant 6,727,894 - Karidis , et al. April 27, 2 | 2004-04-27 |
| Flexibly interfaceable portable computing device Grant 6,628,267 - Karidis , et al. September 30, 2 | 2003-09-30 |
| Flexibly interfaceable portable computing device Grant 6,362,440 - Karidis , et al. March 26, 2 | 2002-03-26 |
| Flexibly interfaceable portable computing device App 20020024499 - Karidis, John Peter ; et al. | 2002-02-28 |
| Methods, systems and products pertaining to a digitizer for use in paper based record systems Grant 6,259,043 - Clary , et al. July 10, 2 | 2001-07-10 |
| Thinkscribe combined electronic and paper based scheduling Grant 6,144,371 - Clary , et al. November 7, 2 | 2000-11-07 |
| System and method for automatic handwriting recognition with a writer-independent chirographic label alphabet Grant 5,644,652 - Bellegarda , et al. July 1, 1 | 1997-07-01 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 