loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Nash; John Edward.The latest application filed is for "medico-surgical devices".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Medico-surgical devices Grant 8,584,677 - Field , et al. November 19, 2 | 2013-11-19 |
Medico-surgical Devices App 20100089402 - Field; Stephen James ;   et al. | 2010-04-15 |
Laryngeal mask assemblies App 20080092903 - Nash; John Edward | 2008-04-24 |
Catheters Grant 7,351,199 - Nash April 1, 2 | 2008-04-01 |
Patient ventilation devices Grant 7,077,138 - Bateman , et al. July 18, 2 | 2006-07-18 |
Oocyte and embryo handling apparatus Grant 6,875,168 - Bateman , et al. April 5, 2 | 2005-04-05 |
Tracheal tubes Grant 6,796,309 - Nash , et al. September 28, 2 | 2004-09-28 |
Oocyte and embryo handling apparatus App 20040092791 - Bateman, Timothy ;   et al. | 2004-05-13 |
Catheters App 20040039247 - Nash, John Edward | 2004-02-26 |
Tracheal tubes App 20020078962 - Nash, John Edward ;   et al. | 2002-06-27 |
Patient ventilation devices App 20020033175 - Bateman, Timothy ;   et al. | 2002-03-21 |
Introducers and tube assemblies Grant 6,286,509 - Nash , et al. September 11, 2 | 2001-09-11 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.