loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Naroditsky; Dmitry.The latest application filed is for "belly armor".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Belly armor Grant 8,601,931 - Naroditsky , et al. December 10, 2 | 2013-12-10 |
Belly Armor App 20120174767 - Naroditsky; Dmitry ;   et al. | 2012-07-12 |
Belly Armor App 20110017054 - NARODITSKY; Dmitry ;   et al. | 2011-01-27 |
Safety Apparatus For Providing Protection Against An Explosion And Vehicle Comprising Same App 20100251883 - NARODITSKY; Dmitry | 2010-10-07 |
Underbelly For An Armored Vehicle App 20100218667 - NARODITSKY; Dmitry ;   et al. | 2010-09-02 |
Light intensifier tube Grant 7,015,642 - Gaber , et al. March 21, 2 | 2006-03-21 |
Light intensifier tube App 20050116148 - Gaber, Leonid ;   et al. | 2005-06-02 |
Object detection apparatus Grant 6,700,123 - Musiel , et al. March 2, 2 | 2004-03-02 |
Image intensifier tube of a simplified construction with a shutter electrode App 20030150980 - Gaber, Leonid ;   et al. | 2003-08-14 |
Object detection apparatus App 20030141452 - Musiel, Michael J. ;   et al. | 2003-07-31 |
Light intensifier tube App 20030141814 - Gaber, Leonid ;   et al. | 2003-07-31 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.