Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Nanozen Industries Inc..The latest application filed is for "particle discrimination and classification by multiple-wavelength light scattering".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Particle Discrimination And Classification By Multiple-wavelength Light Scattering App 20220283075 - CHU; Chu-Hui Winnie ;   et al. | 2022-09-08 |
Digital holography with an internal impactor for particle imaging, classification, and mass density characterization Grant 11,073,461 - Li July 27, 2 | 2021-07-27 |
One dimensional beam homogenization with a single aspheric lens for accurate particle sizing instrumentation Grant 10,823,659 - Li November 3, 2 | 2020-11-03 |
One Dimensional Beam Homogenization with a Single Aspheric Lens for Accurate Particle Sizing Instrumentation App 20200182773 - Li; Jingwen | 2020-06-11 |
Digital Holography With An Internal Impactor For Particle Imaging, Classification, And Mass Density Characterization App 20200132581 - LI; Jingwen | 2020-04-30 |
NCAGE Code | L0HX1 | NANOZEN INDUSTRIES INC |
CAGE Code | L0HX1 | NANOZEN INDUSTRIES INC NANOZEN |
S.A.M. Registration | L0HX1 [200619926] | NANOZEN INDUSTRIES INC NANOZEN |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.