Namba; Hideki
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Namba; Hideki.The latest application filed is for "high-frequency circuit device and high-frequency circuit module".
- Namba; Hideki - Kyoto JP
- Namba; Hideki - Handano JP
- Namba; Hideki - Hadano JP
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| High-frequency circuit device and high-frequency circuit module Grant 7,057,483 - Enokihara , et al. June 6, 2 | 2006-06-06 |
| High-frequency circuit device and high-frequency circuit module App 20050253672 - Enokihara, Akira ; et al. | 2005-11-17 |
| High-frequency circuit device and high-frequency circuit module Grant 6,954,124 - Enokihara , et al. October 11, 2 | 2005-10-11 |
| High frequency circuit element and high frequency circuit module App 20040056736 - Enokihara, Akira ; et al. | 2004-03-25 |
| Computer system and job transfer method using electronic mail system Grant 5,557,736 - Hirosawa , et al. September 17, 1 | 1996-09-17 |
| Electronic mail drive type computer system and file operation method having a mail terminal operating independently of a computer system connected thereto Grant 5,537,543 - Itoh , et al. July 16, 1 | 1996-07-16 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 