loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Nakajima; Shoichi.The latest application filed is for "accessory mounting device for saddle riding type vehicle".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Electrical accessory mounting device for a saddle-type vehicle Grant 8,627,990 - Nakajima , et al. January 14, 2 | 2014-01-14 |
Method and apparatus for manufacturing for fixing a mounting ring to an exhaust pipe assembly Grant 8,610,023 - Nakajima December 17, 2 | 2013-12-17 |
Accessory mounting device for saddle riding type vehicle Grant 8,534,521 - Nakajima September 17, 2 | 2013-09-17 |
External cylinder and silencer provided with the external cylinder Grant 8,104,571 - Nakajima January 31, 2 | 2012-01-31 |
Accessory Mounting Device For Saddle Riding Type Vehicle App 20110233249 - Nakajima; Shoichi | 2011-09-29 |
Electrical Accessory Mounting Device For A Saddle-type Vehicle App 20110233250 - Nakajima; Shoichi ;   et al. | 2011-09-29 |
External Cylinder And Silencer Provided With The External Cylinder App 20110048849 - Nakajima; Shoichi | 2011-03-03 |
Method And Apparatus For Manufacturing An Exhaust Pipe Assembly App 20100326961 - Nakajima; Shoichi | 2010-12-30 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.