loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Nakagoshi; Akira.The latest application filed is for "anti-drowsing device and anti-drowsing method".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Anti-drowsing device and anti-drowsing method Grant 8,537,000 - Nakagoshi , et al. September 17, 2 | 2013-09-17 |
Awake state estimation device Grant 8,260,501 - Nakagoshi , et al. September 4, 2 | 2012-09-04 |
Drowsy state determination device and method Grant 7,830,266 - Nakagoshi , et al. November 9, 2 | 2010-11-09 |
Anti-drowsing Device And Anti-drowsing Method App 20100214087 - Nakagoshi; Akira ;   et al. | 2010-08-26 |
Awake State Estimation Device App 20090048737 - NAKAGOSHI; Akira ;   et al. | 2009-02-19 |
Drowsy State Determination Device And Method App 20090027212 - NAKAGOSHI; Akira ;   et al. | 2009-01-29 |
Vehicle information notification device App 20060195241 - Nakagoshi; Akira | 2006-08-31 |
Carbon fiber woven fabric Grant 6,110,847 - Yamamoto , et al. August 29, 2 | 2000-08-29 |
Pitch based carbon fiber and process for producing the same Grant 5,721,308 - Yamamoto , et al. February 24, 1 | 1998-02-24 |
Process for producing pitch-type carbon fibers Grant 4,923,692 - Nakagoshi , et al. May 8, 1 | 1990-05-08 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.