Nagle; John
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Nagle; John.The latest application filed is for "system and method for improving integrity of internet search".
- Nagle; John - Menlo Park CA
Trademarks
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| System and method for improving integrity of internet search Grant 8,244,708 - Nagle August 14, 2 | 2012-08-14 |
| System and method for improving integrity of internet search App 20120005170 - Nagle; John | 2012-01-05 |
| System and method for improving integrity of internet search Grant 8,046,346 - Nagle October 25, 2 | 2011-10-25 |
| System and method for improving integrity of internet search App 20100121835 - Nagle; John | 2010-05-13 |
| System and method for improving integrity of internet search Grant 7,693,833 - Nagle April 6, 2 | 2010-04-06 |
| System and method for improving integrity of internet search App 20080189263 - Nagle; John | 2008-08-07 |
| Method and system for generating realistic collisions in graphical simulations Grant 6,067,096 - Nagle May 23, 2 | 2000-05-23 |
| Anti-slip control for a legged robot and realisitc simulation of a legged creature Grant 5,644,204 - Nagle July 1, 1 | 1997-07-01 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 