Nacamuli; Marc
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Nacamuli; Marc.The latest application filed is for "disposition introduced in windshield wiper blade and the respective assembly system".
- Nacamuli; Marc - Guarulhos BR
- Nacamuli; Marc - Sao Paulo BR
- Nacamuli; Marc - Higienopolis Sao Paulo SP BR
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Disposition Introduced in Windshield Wiper Blade and the Respective Assembly System App 20130185891 - Nacamuli; Marc | 2013-07-25 |
| Blade Components Fitting System App 20080313844 - Nacamuli; Marc | 2008-12-25 |
| Arrangement introduced in wiper blade Grant 7,210,189 - Nacamuli May 1, 2 | 2007-05-01 |
| Arrangement introduced in wiper blade App 20060037167 - Nacamuli; Marc | 2006-02-23 |
| Arrangement of shaft coupling element for windscreen wiper Grant 6,591,445 - Nacamuli July 15, 2 | 2003-07-15 |
| Articulation system between windscreen wiper components Grant 6,393,654 - Nacamuli May 28, 2 | 2002-05-28 |
| Arrangement of shaft coupling element for windscreen wiper App 20020026681 - Nacamuli, Marc | 2002-03-07 |
| Articulation system between windscreen wiper components App 20020002755 - Nacamuli, Marc | 2002-01-10 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 