Na; Chan Karam
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Na; Chan Karam.The latest application filed is for "dual purge ejector and dual purge system using the same".
- Na; Chan Karam - Gyeonggi-do KR
- Na; Chan Karam - Seoul KR
- Na; Chan Karam - Gunpo Gyeonggi-do
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Positive crankcase ventilation outlet anti-freezing device of intake manifold of vehicle engine Grant 11,371,476 - Kim , et al. June 28, 2 | 2022-06-28 |
| Dual Purge Ejector And Dual Purge System Using The Same App 20210388797 - Kim; Dong June ; et al. | 2021-12-16 |
| positive crankcase ventilation OUTLET ANTI-FREEZING DEVICE OF INTAKE MANIFOLD OF VEHICLE ENGINE App 20210246854 - Kim; Min Ki ; et al. | 2021-08-12 |
| Structure for preventing freezing of blow-by gas in intake manifold Grant 10,641,216 - Kim , et al. | 2020-05-05 |
| Anti-icing device for intake manifold Grant 10,508,627 - Kim , et al. Dec | 2019-12-17 |
| Structure For Preventing Freezing Of Blow-by Gas In Intake Manifold App 20190203682 - Kim; Min Ki ; et al. | 2019-07-04 |
| Anti-icing Device For Intake Manifold App 20190032611 - Kim; Min Ki ; et al. | 2019-01-31 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 