loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Mourik; Nephi A..The latest application filed is for "polycrystalline diamond material with high toughness and high wear resistance".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Polycrystalline diamond material with high toughness and high wear resistance Grant 9,447,642 - Bellin , et al. September 20, 2 | 2016-09-20 |
Functionally graded polycrystalline diamond insert Grant 8,695,733 - Fang , et al. April 15, 2 | 2014-04-15 |
Polycrystalline ultra-hard compact constructions Grant 8,672,061 - Voronin , et al. March 18, 2 | 2014-03-18 |
Polycrystalline Diamond Material With High Toughness And High Wear Resistance App 20140060938 - Bellin; Federico ;   et al. | 2014-03-06 |
Functionally Graded Polycrystalline Diamond Insert App 20110042147 - Fang; Yi ;   et al. | 2011-02-24 |
Highly Wear Resistant Diamond Insert With Improved Transition Structure App 20110031033 - Mourik; Nephi A. ;   et al. | 2011-02-10 |
Diamond Transition Layer Construction With Improved Thickness Ratio App 20110031032 - Mourik; Nephi A. ;   et al. | 2011-02-10 |
Polycrystalline Diamond Material With High Toughness And High Wear Resistance App 20110031037 - Bellin; Federico ;   et al. | 2011-02-10 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.