loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Mound; William Roderick.The latest application filed is for "chemical compounds".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Chemical compounds Grant 9,963,445 - Clough , et al. May 8, 2 | 2018-05-08 |
Herbicidally active cyclic dione compounds, or derivatives therefor, substituted by a phenyl which has an alkynyl-containing substituent Grant 9,615,577 - Mound , et al. April 11, 2 | 2017-04-11 |
Chemical compounds Grant 9,611,248 - Dowling , et al. April 4, 2 | 2017-04-04 |
Chemical Compounds App 20160159767 - DOWLING; Alan John ;   et al. | 2016-06-09 |
Chemical Compounds App 20160159781 - CLOUCH; John Martin ;   et al. | 2016-06-09 |
Herbicidally Active Cyclic Dione Compounds, Or Derivatives Therefor, Substituted By A Phenyl Which Has An Alkynyl-containing Substituent App 20150342185 - Mound; William Roderick ;   et al. | 2015-12-03 |
Chemical Compounds App 20110086759 - Aspinall; Mary Bernadette ;   et al. | 2011-04-14 |
Isothiazole derivatives and their use as pesticides Grant 6,703,347 - Armstrong , et al. March 9, 2 | 2004-03-09 |
Isothiazole derivatives and their use as pesticides App 20030207926 - Armstrong, Sarag ;   et al. | 2003-11-06 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.