Moll; Frederick H.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Moll; Frederick H..The latest application filed is for "in vivo accessories for minimally invasive surgery".
- Moll; Frederick H. - Woodside CA
- Moll; Frederick H. - San Francisco CA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| In Vivo Accessories for Minimally Invasive Surgery App 20140018824 - Julian; Christopher A. ; et al. | 2014-01-16 |
| In vivo accessories for minimally invasive robotic surgery Grant 8,551,116 - Julian , et al. October 8, 2 | 2013-10-08 |
| In Vivo Accesories For Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery App 20120259345 - Julian; Christopher A. ; et al. | 2012-10-11 |
| In vivo accessories for minimally invasive robotic surgery Grant 8,182,476 - Julian , et al. May 22, 2 | 2012-05-22 |
| In vivo accessories for minimally invasive robotic surgery Grant 7,722,599 - Julian , et al. May 25, 2 | 2010-05-25 |
| Peritoneal distension robotic arm Grant 5,555,897 - Lathrop, Jr. , et al. September 17, 1 | 1996-09-17 |
| Peritoneal distension robotic arm Grant 5,372,147 - Lathrop, Jr. , et al. December 13, 1 | 1994-12-13 |
| Optical viewing device Grant 4,784,118 - Fantone , et al. November 15, 1 | 1988-11-15 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 