loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Mode; Duane R..The latest application filed is for "carton with reclosable fitment".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Carton with reclosable fitment Grant 9,108,761 - Fitzwater , et al. August 18, 2 | 2015-08-18 |
Carton With Reclosable Fitment App 20130306717 - Fitzwater; Kelly R. ;   et al. | 2013-11-21 |
Foldable, microwavable baking pan usable as a promotional device Grant 5,253,802 - Bernard , et al. October 19, 1 | 1993-10-19 |
Pre-glued tapered tray with gussets and flanges Grant 4,951,868 - Mode August 28, 1 | 1990-08-28 |
Locking, double-layered microwave package Grant 4,876,427 - Mode October 24, 1 | 1989-10-24 |
Tapered tray with pre-glued elevating legs Grant 4,871,111 - Mode October 3, 1 | 1989-10-03 |
Two-celled expandable microwave cooking sling Grant 4,820,893 - Mode April 11, 1 | 1989-04-11 |
Compartmented box Grant D287,464 - Mode December 30, 1 | 1986-12-30 |
Compartmented food placemat Grant 4,562,926 - Mode January 7, 1 | 1986-01-07 |
Multi-compartmented food serving tray and blank therefor Grant 4,489,879 - Mode December 25, 1 | 1984-12-25 |
Carton Grant D273,462 - Mode April 17, 1 | 1984-04-17 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.