loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Moats; Michael S..The latest application filed is for "smooth surface morphology chlorate anode coating".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Smooth surface morphology chlorate anode coating Grant 8,142,898 - Carlson , et al. March 27, 2 | 2012-03-27 |
Porous non-asbestos separator and method of making same Grant 7,850,832 - Tomba , et al. December 14, 2 | 2010-12-14 |
Smooth Surface Morphology Chlorate Anode Coating App 20100044219 - Carlson; Richard C. ;   et al. | 2010-02-25 |
Smooth surface morphology chlorate anode coating Grant 7,632,535 - Carlson , et al. December 15, 2 | 2009-12-15 |
Porous Non-Asbestos Separator and Method of Making Same App 20080257722 - Tomba; Nick J. ;   et al. | 2008-10-23 |
High Efficiency Hypochlorite Anode Coating App 20070261968 - Carlson; Richard C. ;   et al. | 2007-11-15 |
Smooth surface morphology chlorate anode coating App 20070134428 - Carlson; Richard C. ;   et al. | 2007-06-14 |
Anodic protection systems and methods Grant 6,998,029 - Hardee , et al. February 14, 2 | 2006-02-14 |
Anodic protection systems and methods App 20030066759 - Hardee, Kenneth L. ;   et al. | 2003-04-10 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.