Mitchell David M
USPTO Trademark & Patent Filings
Trademark applications and grants for Mitchell David M. Mitchell David M has 1 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "DAVID MERRITT MITCHELL"
- Company Aliases
- mitchell, david, m
- m david mitchell
- Mitchell; David M. - Scottsdale AZ
- Mitchell; David M. - Decatur GA
- Mitchell; David M. - Dunwoody GA
Trademarks Patents
| Patent Application | Date |
|---|---|
| Hybrid communications cable for enhancement of transmission capability 5,448,669 - 08/171,885 Dunn , et al. September 5, 1 | 1995-09-05 |
| Communication cable having water-blocking capabilities 5,373,100 - 08/147,110 Arroyo , et al. December 13, 1 | 1994-12-13 |
| Cables which include waterblocking provisions 5,306,867 - 07/938,095 Connole , et al. April 26, 1 | 1994-04-26 |
| Aerial metallic shielded cable having waterblocking provisions 5,095,176 - 07/536,816 Harbrecht , et al. March 10, 1 | 1992-03-10 |
| Local area network cable 4,755,629 - 06/910,848 Beggs , et al. July 5, 1 | 1988-07-05 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
|---|---|
"DAVID MERRITT MITCHELL" 87329228 |
DAVID MERRITT MITCHELL 2017-02-08 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 