loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Mishina; Noriko.The latest application filed is for "novel thiophenediamine derivative having urea structure".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Thiophenediamine derivative having urea structure Grant 8,288,380 - Mogi , et al. October 16, 2 | 2012-10-16 |
Novel Thiophenediamine Derivative Having Urea Structure App 20120202808 - Mogi; Hiroyuki ;   et al. | 2012-08-09 |
Thiophenediamine derivative having urea structure Grant 8,198,271 - Mogi , et al. June 12, 2 | 2012-06-12 |
N- (2-aminophenyl) benzamide derivative having urea structure Grant 8,076,332 - Mogi , et al. December 13, 2 | 2011-12-13 |
Pyridinecarboxylic acid (2-aminophenyl) amide derivative having urea structure Grant 8,012,972 - Mogi , et al. September 6, 2 | 2011-09-06 |
Novel Thiophenediamine Derivative Having Urea Structure App 20110077244 - Mogi; Hiroyaki ;   et al. | 2011-03-31 |
Novel Pyridinecarboxylic Acid (2-aminophenyl) Amide Derivative Having Urea Structure App 20100063045 - Mogi; Hiroyuki ;   et al. | 2010-03-11 |
Novel N- (2-aminophenyl) Benzamide Derivative Having Urea Structure App 20090306077 - Mogi; Hiroyuki ;   et al. | 2009-12-10 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.