loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Milliken; Christopher E..The latest application filed is for "solid oxide fuel cell stack assembly having tapered diffusion layers".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Solid oxide fuel cell stack assembly having tapered diffusion layers Grant 7,163,759 - Milliken , et al. January 16, 2 | 2007-01-16 |
Electrochemical apparatus with reactant micro-channels Grant 6,878,480 - Ruhl , et al. April 12, 2 | 2005-04-12 |
Solid oxide fuel cell stack assembly having tapered diffusion layers App 20040081875 - Milliken, Christopher E. ;   et al. | 2004-04-29 |
Apparatus and method for cooling high-temperature fuel cell stacks Grant 6,489,050 - Ruhl , et al. December 3, 2 | 2002-12-03 |
Electrochemical apparatus with reactant micro-channels App 20020132156 - Ruhl, Robert C. ;   et al. | 2002-09-19 |
Technique for rapid cured electrochemical apparatus component fabrication Grant 6,399,233 - Milliken , et al. June 4, 2 | 2002-06-04 |
Electrochemical apparatus with reactant micro-channels Grant 6,361,892 - Ruhl , et al. March 26, 2 | 2002-03-26 |
Method for steam reforming hydrocarbons using a sulfur-tolerant catalyst Grant 6,238,816 - Cable , et al. May 29, 2 | 2001-05-29 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.