Milligan; Barton
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Milligan; Barton.The latest application filed is for "high molecular weight poly(toluenediamine aramide) and a method for their preparation".
- Milligan; Barton - Freeport BS
- Milligan; Barton - Coplay PA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| High molecular weight poly(toluenediamine aramide) and a method for their preparation Grant 4,885,356 - Milligan , et al. December 5, 1 | 1989-12-05 |
| Process for the preparation of polyisocyanate prepolymers and polyurethanes having high temperature performance and low hysteresis Grant 4,786,703 - Starner , et al. November 22, 1 | 1988-11-22 |
| Process for producing polyurethane/urea elastomers Grant 4,722,989 - Starner , et al. February 2, 1 | 1988-02-02 |
| Reinforced polyurethane tires Grant 4,519,432 - Schmidt , et al. May 28, 1 | 1985-05-28 |
| Polyurethane compositions having low hysteresis Grant 4,507,459 - Schmidt , et al. March 26, 1 | 1985-03-26 |
| Polyurethanes prepated using poly(silyldiamines) Grant 4,448,939 - Fasolka , et al. May 15, 1 | 1984-05-15 |
| Synthesis of isocyanates from nitroalkanes Grant 4,341,898 - Milligan , et al. July 27, 1 | 1982-07-27 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 