MicroTherapeutics, Inc.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for MicroTherapeutics, Inc..The latest application filed is for "thin film stent".
- MicroTherapeutics, Inc. - Irvine CA
- MicroTherapeutics, Inc. - San Clemente CA
- MicroTherapeutics, Inc. - N/A
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Thin film stent Grant 7,455,753 - Roth November 25, 2 | 2008-11-25 |
| Intracranial stent and method of use Grant 7,323,005 - Wallace , et al. January 29, 2 | 2008-01-29 |
| Compositions for use in embolizing blood vessels Grant 6,756,031 - Evans , et al. June 29, 2 | 2004-06-29 |
| Intracranial stent and method of use Grant 6,669,719 - Wallace , et al. December 30, 2 | 2003-12-30 |
| Interface needle and method for creating a blunt interface between delivered liquids Grant 6,511,472 - Hayman , et al. January 28, 2 | 2003-01-28 |
| Flow directed catheter Grant 6,171,296 - Chow January 9, 2 | 2001-01-09 |
| Intracranial stent and method of use Grant 6,007,573 - Wallace , et al. December 28, 1 | 1999-12-28 |
| Compositions for use in embolizing blood vessels Grant 5,851,508 - Greff , et al. December 22, 1 | 1998-12-22 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 