loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Mickelson; N. Peter.The latest application filed is for "protected telephone network termination module".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Protected telephone network termination module Grant 5,548,641 - Butler , et al. August 20, 1 | 1996-08-20 |
Telephone network enclosure containing protected termination device Grant 5,479,505 - Butler , et al. * December 26, 1 | 1995-12-26 |
Telephone network interface enclosure Grant 5,416,837 - Cote , et al. * May 16, 1 | 1995-05-16 |
Telephone network termination module having insulation displacement terminals Grant 5,333,193 - Cote , et al. July 26, 1 | 1994-07-26 |
Protected telephone network interface device Grant 5,313,519 - Mickelson , et al. May 17, 1 | 1994-05-17 |
Protected telephone network interface device Grant 5,153,910 - Mickelson , et al. October 6, 1 | 1992-10-06 |
Telephone network interface device Grant D291,081 - Mickelson , et al. July 28, 1 | 1987-07-28 |
Surge arrester for RF transmission line Grant 4,633,359 - Mickelson , et al. December 30, 1 | 1986-12-30 |
Telephone network interface connector Grant 4,588,238 - Mickelson , et al. May 13, 1 | 1986-05-13 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.