Meyer; Richard W.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Meyer; Richard W..The latest application filed is for "vehicular infant occupancy indicator system".
- Meyer; Richard W. - Vallejo CA
- Meyer; Richard W. - Redwood City CA
- Meyer; Richard W. - Goleta CA
- Meyer; Richard W. - Toledo OH
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Vehicular Infant Occupancy Indicator System App 20160016520 - Meyer; Richard W. | 2016-01-21 |
| Third party direct memory access protocol extension to separate data path from control path Grant 8,539,109 - Lee , et al. September 17, 2 | 2013-09-17 |
| Gateway for connecting clients and servers utilizing remote direct memory access controls to separate data path from control path Grant 8,527,661 - Lee , et al. September 3, 2 | 2013-09-03 |
| Gateway for connecting storage clients and storage servers Grant 8,396,981 - Lee , et al. March 12, 2 | 2013-03-12 |
| Adjustable work piece clamping system Grant 4,157,819 - Meyer June 12, 1 | 1979-06-12 |
| Apparatus For Measuring The Psychogalvanic Reflex Grant 3,841,316 - Meyer October 15, 1 | 1974-10-15 |
| Laser Beam Severing Of A Rotating Article Grant 3,839,005 - Meyer October 1, 1 | 1974-10-01 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 