Meuth; Thomas Larry
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Meuth; Thomas Larry.The latest application filed is for "method of making a receiving block having a highly frictional receptacle".
- Meuth; Thomas Larry - Spring TX
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Method of securing an elongated member to a support member Grant 6,832,427 - Meuth , et al. December 21, 2 | 2004-12-21 |
| High strength buoyant clamp assembly and method of using same Grant 6,612,526 - Meuth , et al. September 2, 2 | 2003-09-02 |
| Method of securing an elongated member to a support member App 20030029978 - Meuth, Thomas Larry ; et al. | 2003-02-13 |
| Method of making a receiving block having a highly frictional receptacle App 20030029979 - Meuth, Thomas Larry | 2003-02-13 |
| High strength buoyant clamp assembly and method of using same App 20020096611 - Meuth, Thomas Larry ; et al. | 2002-07-25 |
| Ultra high strength clamp assembly Grant 5,921,517 - Meuth July 13, 1 | 1999-07-13 |
| Umbilical line stand-off assembly for marine riser assembly Grant 5,904,445 - Meuth May 18, 1 | 1999-05-18 |
| Pipe end load support and protector apparatus Grant 5,866,218 - Meuth February 2, 1 | 1999-02-02 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 