Trademark applications and grants for Metu System Meinig Kg. Metu System Meinig Kg has 1 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "METU"
Patent Application | Date |
---|---|
Butt Joint Between Two Pipe Segments of Sheet Metal and Process for Manufacture Thereof 20060186665 - 11/381306 Meinig; Manfred | 2006-08-24 |
Process for butt joining two pipe segments and producing a connecting flange 7,464,453 - 11/381,306 Meinig December 16, 2 | 2008-12-16 |
Butt joint between two pipe segments of sheet metal and process for manufacture thereof 7,073,826 - 10/407,358 Meinig July 11, 2 | 2006-07-11 |
Butt connection between two air duct sections made sheet of metal 5,133,580 - 07/656,715 Meinig July 28, 1 | 1992-07-28 |
Butt joint between two thin-walled round sheet metal pipe sections 4,822,083 - 07/179,868 Meinig April 18, 1 | 1989-04-18 |
Air duct section with form fitted connecting flange 4,739,802 - 06/847,170 Meinig April 26, 1 | 1988-04-26 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
---|---|
"METU" 1638881 73780137 |
METU 1989-02-13 |
NCAGE Code | C6667 | METU-SYSTEM MEINIG KG |
CAGE Code | C6667 | METU-SYSTEM MEINIG KG |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.