Mesenich; Gerhard
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Mesenich; Gerhard.The latest application filed is for "electromagnetic fuel injector with cartridge embodiment".
- Mesenich; Gerhard - Bochum DE
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Electromagnetic fuel injector with cartridge embodiment Grant 5,190,223 - Mesenich March 2, 1 | 1993-03-02 |
| Electromaagnetic high-pressure injection valve Grant 5,127,585 - Mesenich July 7, 1 | 1992-07-07 |
| Electromagnetic fuel injector with diaphragm spring Grant 5,044,563 - Mesenich September 3, 1 | 1991-09-03 |
| Electromagnetic injection valve Grant 4,984,549 - Mesenich January 15, 1 | 1991-01-15 |
| Pulse modulated hydraulic valve Grant 4,979,542 - Mesenich December 25, 1 | 1990-12-25 |
| Electromagnet and valve assembly Grant 4,883,252 - Mesenich November 28, 1 | 1989-11-28 |
| Electromagnet for valves Grant 4,810,985 - Mesenich March 7, 1 | 1989-03-07 |
| Combined fuel injector and pressure regulator assembly Grant 4,798,329 - Mesenich January 17, 1 | 1989-01-17 |
| Spring arrangement with additional mass for improvement of the dynamic behavior of electromagnetic systems Grant 4,749,892 - Mesenich June 7, 1 | 1988-06-07 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 