Merit Industries Inc
USPTO Trademark & Patent Filings
Trademark applications and grants for Merit Industries Inc. Merit Industries Inc has 63 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "HOOP MADNESS"
- Company Aliases
- MERIT INDUSTRIES INC.
- MERIT INDUSTRIES, INC.
- MERIT INDUSTRIES, INC. - Bristol PA
- MERIT INDUSTRIES, INC. - Bensalem PA
- MERIT INDUSTRIES, INC. - 2525 State Road Bensalem PA
Trademarks Patents
| Patent Application | Date |
|---|---|
| ELECTRONIC GAME HAVING AN AUTOMATIC CONTINUE FEATURE 20090131153 - 12/041073 Higbie; Colin | 2009-05-21 |
| AMUSEMENT DEVICE HAVING ELECTRONIC GAME AND JUKEBOX FUNCTIONALITIES 20090075726 - 12/212196 Stelzer; James R. ; et al. | 2009-03-19 |
| ELECTRONIC VALUE-OPERATED AND BATTERY POWERED PORTABLE AMUSEMENT DEVICE 20080200257 - 12/033534 Stelzer; James R. | 2008-08-21 |
| AMUSEMENT DEVICE SHARED RESOURCE SYSTEM AND METHOD 20080102961 - 11/965234 Hedin; Dean ; et al. | 2008-05-01 |
| INTERACTIVE AMUSEMENT DEVICE ADVERTISING 20080045336 - 11/840937 Stelzer; James R. ; et al. | 2008-02-21 |
| NCAGE Code | 07650 | MERIT INDUSTRIES INC |
| CAGE Code | 07650 | MERIT INDUSTRIES INC |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 