Trademark applications and grants for Meinan Machinery Works Inc. Meinan Machinery Works Inc has 3 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "ARIST-LATHE"
Patent Application | Date |
---|---|
VENEER SORTING CONTROL DEVICE, VENEER SORTING CONTROL METHOD, AND PROGRAM FOR VENEER SORTING CONTROL 20220215527 - 17/607624 MORITA; Koji | 2022-07-07 |
A KNIFE CARRIAGE, A ROTARY VENEER LATHE HAVING THE SAME, AND A VENEER SLICER HAVING THE SAME 20220152866 - 17/601004 KOIKE; Masaru | 2022-05-19 |
DEFECT INSPECTION SYSTEM, DEFECT INSPECTION METHOD, AND DEFECT INSPECTION PROGRAM FOR WOOD PLANK 20220051392 - 17/335722 MORITA; Koji | 2022-02-17 |
LOG FEEDING APPARATUS, LOG PROCESSING APPARATUS HAVING THE SAME, AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING THE SAME 20220009120 - 17/294168 KONISHI; Keita ;   et al. | 2022-01-13 |
VENEER SHEET CONVEYING APPARATUS AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING THE SAME 20210237307 - 16/494758 IKEMOTO; Fumitoshi ;   et al. | 2021-08-05 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
---|---|
![]() "ARIST-LATHE" 1774915 74181701 |
ARIST-LATHE 1991-07-02 |
![]() "M" 1304720 73421531 |
M 1983-04-14 |
![]() "MEINAN" 1301249 73421532 |
MEINAN 1983-04-14 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.