Meiko Pet Corporation
USPTO Trademark & Patent Filings
Trademark applications and grants for Meiko Pet Corporation. Meiko Pet Corporation has 2 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "PET KING"
- Company Aliases
- Meiko Pet Corporation
- MEIKO PET CORPORATION -
- Meiko Pet Corporation -
- Meiko Pet Corporation. -
| State Incorporated | TAIWAN |
| Entity Type | CORPORATION |
| Address | No. 12, Industrial 14th Road, Ta Li Taichung Hsien TAIWAN |
Trademarks Patents
| Patent Application | Date |
|---|---|
| Air pump having an adjustable interval between an electromagnetic device and an air chamber 20080298988 - 11/806253 Wang; Chiao-Ming | 2008-12-04 |
| Air pump for aquariums 20070237653 - 11/393810 Wang; Chiao-Ming | 2007-10-11 |
| Heat preservation pad 20070102413 - 11/267501 Wang; Chiao-Ming | 2007-05-10 |
| Aquarium cleaning mop 20060037159 - 10/920339 Wang; Chiao-Ming | 2006-02-23 |
| Small air pump 20050158189 - 10/758087 Wang, Chiao-Ming | 2005-07-21 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
|---|---|
"PET KING" 76571516 |
PET KING 2004-01-21 |
"AQUA ACE" 3018330 76571517 |
AQUA ACE 2004-01-21 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 