Jin Mei
USPTO Trademark & Patent Filings
Trademark applications and grants for Jin Mei. Jin Mei has 2 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "K KCEER"
- Company Aliases
- Jin Mei
- jin mei
- Jin, Mei - Wanghua District CN
- Jin, Mei - Liaoning Province CN
- Jin; Mei - Liaoning Province CN
- Jin; Mei - Liaoning CN
| Entity Type | INDIVIDUAL |
| Address | Baishan Community Middle Street, Baishan Town, Lujiang County, Hefei,Anhui CHINA 231531 |
Trademarks Patents
| Patent Application | Date |
|---|---|
| Process for carrying out gas-liquid countercurrent processing 20040112794 - 10/682593 Han, Baoping ; et al. | 2004-06-17 |
| Process for hydroconverting a heavy hydrocarbon chargestock 20030006167 - 10/035195 Han, Baoping ; et al. | 2003-01-09 |
| Process for carrying out gas-liquid countercurrent processing 7,435,336 - 10/682,593 Han , et al. October 14, 2 | 2008-10-14 |
| Process for hydroconverting a heavy hydrocarbon chargestock 6,726,833 - 10/035,195 Han , et al. April 27, 2 | 2004-04-27 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
|---|---|
"K KCEER" 88561068 |
K KCEER 2019-08-02 |
"REARHILL" 88561014 |
REARHILL 2019-08-01 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 