loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for McNally; Christopher Wade.The latest application filed is for "method and system for reporting and processing information relating to railroad assets".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Method, system, and computer software code for detection and isolation of electrical ground failure and secondary failure Grant 7,746,604 - McNally , et al. June 29, 2 | 2010-06-29 |
Electrical ground isolation and secondary failure reduction detection and isolation Grant 7,256,974 - McNally , et al. August 14, 2 | 2007-08-14 |
Method and system for reporting and processing information relating to railroad assets App 20060195327 - Kumar; Ajith Kuttannair ;   et al. | 2006-08-31 |
Electrical ground isolation and secondary failure reduction detection and isolation App 20060181821 - McNally; Christopher Wade ;   et al. | 2006-08-17 |
Electrical ground isolation and secondary failure reduction detection and isolation Grant 7,035,065 - McNally , et al. April 25, 2 | 2006-04-25 |
Electrical ground isolation and secondary failure reduction detection and isolation App 20030184932 - McNally, Christopher Wade ;   et al. | 2003-10-02 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.