loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Mayne; Doug.The latest application filed is for "submersible remote operated vehicle tool change control".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Submersible Remote Operated Vehicle Tool Change Control App 20200317312 - Leonhardt; Mark ;   et al. | 2020-10-08 |
Sheet-feeding device and method of feeding sheet media Grant 8,011,653 - Mayne September 6, 2 | 2011-09-06 |
Sheet-feeding device and method of feeding sheet media App 20080265492 - Mayne; Doug | 2008-10-30 |
Slider impedance mechanism to prevent cartridge ejection during operation Grant 6,707,638 - Mayne March 16, 2 | 2004-03-16 |
Slider impedance mechanism to prevent cartridge ejection during operation App 20020186501 - Mayne, Doug | 2002-12-12 |
Camming Belt Clip App 20020170148 - Mayne, Doug ;   et al. | 2002-11-21 |
Camming belt clip Grant 6,470,535 - Mayne , et al. October 29, 2 | 2002-10-29 |
Storage device enclosure Grant D448,026 - Nicklos , et al. September 18, 2 | 2001-09-18 |
Data storage drive and cartridge having alignment openings for cartridge mounting and ejection Grant 5,943,185 - Bracken , et al. August 24, 1 | 1999-08-24 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.