loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Mayberry; James E..The latest application filed is for "distal protection filter".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Distal protection filter Grant 8,647,359 - Broome , et al. February 11, 2 | 2014-02-11 |
Deflectable interstitial ablation device Grant 7,909,821 - Paddock , et al. March 22, 2 | 2011-03-22 |
Extension system for pressure-sensing guidewires Grant 6,685,653 - Ehr , et al. February 3, 2 | 2004-02-03 |
Distal protection filter App 20030130682 - Broome, Thomas E. ;   et al. | 2003-07-10 |
Extension system for pressure-sensing guidewires App 20030114775 - Ehr, Timothy G. J. ;   et al. | 2003-06-19 |
Deflectable interstitial ablation device App 20030028188 - Paddock, Kimberly A. ;   et al. | 2003-02-06 |
Deflectable interstitial ablation device Grant 6,482,203 - Paddock , et al. November 19, 2 | 2002-11-19 |
Delectable interstitial ablation device App 20020040221 - Paddock, Kimberly A. ;   et al. | 2002-04-04 |
Deflectable interstitial ablation device Grant 6,352,534 - Paddock , et al. March 5, 2 | 2002-03-05 |
Deflectable interstitial ablation device Grant 6,238,389 - Paddock , et al. May 29, 2 | 2001-05-29 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.