Maurya; Ghanshyam
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Maurya; Ghanshyam.The latest application filed is for "process for micropropagation of pogostemon cablin from a meristematic explant".
- Maurya; Ghanshyam - Navi Mumbai IN
- Maurya; Ghanshyam - Maharashtra IN
- Maurya; Ghanshyam - Jamnagar IN
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Commercially viable process for in vitro mass culture of Jatropha curcas Grant 7,932,086 - Murali , et al. April 26, 2 | 2011-04-26 |
| Process For Micropropagation Of Pogostemon Cablin From A Meristematic Explant App 20100146660 - Krishnapuram; Sreenivasachar Murali ; et al. | 2010-06-10 |
| Commercially Viable Process For In Vitro Mass Culture Of Jatropha Curcas App 20080194026 - MURALI; Krishnapuram Sreenivasachar ; et al. | 2008-08-14 |
| Commercially viable process for in vitro mass culture of jatropha curcas App 20080196121 - Murali; Krishnapuram Sreenivasachar ; et al. | 2008-08-14 |
| Method of in-vitro micropropagation of Piper longum plants Grant 7,402,433 - Sharon , et al. July 22, 2 | 2008-07-22 |
| Efficient method of in-vitro micropropagation of piper longum App 20040203151 - Sharon, Madhuri ; et al. | 2004-10-14 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 