loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Maurer; Donald D..The latest application filed is for "electronic pain feedback system and method".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Electronic pain feedback system and method Grant 5,873,900 - Maurer , et al. February 23, 1 | 1999-02-23 |
Method of making an incontinence electrode Grant 5,667,615 - Maurer , et al. September 16, 1 | 1997-09-16 |
Electronic pain feedback system and method Grant 5,653,739 - Maurer , et al. August 5, 1 | 1997-08-05 |
Incontinence electrode Grant D371,200 - Maurer , et al. June 25, 1 | 1996-06-25 |
Process for making an incontinence electrode Grant 5,516,396 - Maurer , et al. May 14, 1 | 1996-05-14 |
Electrode for activating pelvic reflexes Grant 5,385,577 - Maurer , et al. January 31, 1 | 1995-01-31 |
Method of making an incontinence electrode Grant 5,376,206 - Maurer , et al. December 27, 1 | 1994-12-27 |
Incontinence electrode apparatus Grant 5,370,671 - Maurer , et al. December 6, 1 | 1994-12-06 |
Incontinence electrode apparatus and method Grant 5,314,465 - Maurer , et al. May 24, 1 | 1994-05-24 |
Multiple site drug iontophoresis electronic device and method Grant 5,254,081 - Maurer , et al. October 19, 1 | 1993-10-19 |
Incontinence electrode apparatus Grant 5,199,443 - Maurer , et al. April 6, 1 | 1993-04-06 |
Knee brace with magnetic securing means Grant 5,092,320 - Maurer March 3, 1 | 1992-03-03 |
Vaginal electrode with snap-on electrode pad and method for preparing electrode for use Grant 5,046,511 - Maurer , et al. September 10, 1 | 1991-09-10 |
Expandable vaginal electrode Grant 5,010,895 - Maurer , et al. April 30, 1 | 1991-04-30 |
Intravaginal electrode and stimulation system for controlling female urinary incontinence Grant 4,881,526 - Johnson , et al. November 21, 1 | 1989-11-21 |
Vaginal stimulator for controlling urinary incontinence in women Grant 4,873,996 - Maurer October 17, 1 | 1989-10-17 |
Vaginal stimulator for controlling urinary incontinence in women Grant 4,785,828 - Maurer November 22, 1 | 1988-11-22 |
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator Grant D297,168 - Ioffe , et al. August 9, 1 | 1988-08-09 |
Interrupted drive limb motion apparatus Grant 4,653,479 - Maurer March 31, 1 | 1987-03-31 |
Method and apparatus for healing tissue Grant 4,556,051 - Maurer December 3, 1 | 1985-12-03 |
Method of improving sensory tolerance with modulated nerve stimulator Grant 4,453,548 - Maurer , et al. June 12, 1 | 1984-06-12 |
Method of modulating energy in train of electrical pulses Grant 4,442,839 - Maurer , et al. April 17, 1 | 1984-04-17 |
Modulated deep afferent stimulator Grant 4,431,002 - Maurer , et al. February 14, 1 | 1984-02-14 |
Capacitive energy source and circuitry for powering medical apparatus Grant 4,408,607 - Maurer October 11, 1 | 1983-10-11 |
Stimulation device Grant 4,340,063 - Maurer July 20, 1 | 1982-07-20 |
Electrical stimulation system Grant 4,019,518 - Maurer , et al. April 26, 1 | 1977-04-26 |
Time shared stimulator Grant 3,888,261 - Maurer June 10, 1 | 1975-06-10 |
Transcutaneous Stimulator And Stimulation Method Grant 3,817,254 - Maurer June 18, 1 | 1974-06-18 |
Electrode For Transcutaneous Stimulation Grant 3,817,252 - Maurer June 18, 1 | 1974-06-18 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.