loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Mathews; John G..The latest application filed is for "novelty shoe with detachable ornamental article".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Novelty shoe with detachable ornamental article Grant 5,673,501 - Mathews October 7, 1 | 1997-10-07 |
Snap together protective goggle construction with toric lens Grant 5,617,588 - Canavan , et al. April 8, 1 | 1997-04-08 |
Combined toy mirror and magnifier Grant D372,746 - Mathews August 13, 1 | 1996-08-13 |
Incising trocar and cannula assembly Grant 5,522,831 - Sleister , et al. June 4, 1 | 1996-06-04 |
Toy flashlight Grant D367,087 - Mathews February 13, 1 | 1996-02-13 |
Protective eyeglasses construction Grant 5,457,505 - Canavan , et al. October 10, 1 | 1995-10-10 |
Carrying case for eyeglasses Grant D348,980 - Mathews July 26, 1 | 1994-07-26 |
Belt case for eyeglasses Grant 5,261,582 - Mathews , et al. November 16, 1 | 1993-11-16 |
Protective eyewear assembly Grant 5,170,502 - Hegendorfer , et al. December 15, 1 | 1992-12-15 |
Eyeglasses Grant D331,765 - Canavan , et al. December 15, 1 | 1992-12-15 |
Apparatus for destroying hypodermic needles Grant 5,138,124 - Kirk , et al. August 11, 1 | 1992-08-11 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.