loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Marteau D'Autry; Eric.The latest application filed is for "pipette for dispensing successive volumes of liquid".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Pipette for dispensing successive volumes of liquid Grant 5,770,159 - Marteau D'Autry June 23, 1 | 1998-06-23 |
Automatic filtering and identification of samples Grant 5,417,123 - Marteau D'Autry May 23, 1 | 1995-05-23 |
Process and device for calibrating a sampling and metering pipette Grant 4,790,176 - Marteau d'Autry December 13, 1 | 1988-12-13 |
Method and apparatus for preparing samples for analysis Grant 4,766,082 - Marteau D'Autry August 23, 1 | 1988-08-23 |
Pipette Grant 4,474,071 - Marteau d'Autry October 2, 1 | 1984-10-02 |
Device for sampling and dispensing adjustable volumes of liquid, with numerical display Grant 4,362,063 - Marteau d'Autry December 7, 1 | 1982-12-07 |
Positive-displacement pipette Grant 4,362,064 - Marteau d'Autry December 7, 1 | 1982-12-07 |
Adjustable device for distributing liquid samples Grant 4,229,413 - Marteau d'Autry October 21, 1 | 1980-10-21 |
Pipette which may be calibrated Grant 4,020,698 - Marteau D'Autry May 3, 1 | 1977-05-03 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.