loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Marello; Georges.The latest application filed is for "self-motorized antifriction joint and an articulated assembly, such as a satellite solar panel, equipped with such joints".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Self-motorized antifriction joint and an articulated assembly, such as a satellite solar panel, equipped with such joints Grant 5,086,541 - Auternaud , et al. February 11, 1 | 1992-02-11 |
System for securing an articulated assembly of elements on a spacecraft Grant 4,936,367 - Marello , et al. June 26, 1 | 1990-06-26 |
Temporary edge to edge securement in space of two parts Grant 4,641,985 - Bard , et al. February 10, 1 | 1987-02-10 |
Device for derivation of temporary force for maintaining a displayable appendix in its stored position on a space vehicle Grant 4,529,154 - Rinn , et al. July 16, 1 | 1985-07-16 |
Artificial satellite arrangement with unfoldable solar generators and antennas Grant 4,371,134 - Marello , et al. February 1, 1 | 1983-02-01 |
Device for the synchronized unfolding of articulated elements carrying solar cells in a panel formed by a series of articulated elements Grant 4,155,524 - Marello , et al. May 22, 1 | 1979-05-22 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.